Web hosting comparison with your provider

Current-generation rack server, new, same as Konet Tie

What it means for you. Same class of machine, so you are even here. Ask them when it went into service and if it has an active manufacturer warranty.

Dell PowerEdge R7625 or Rack server 4 to 7 years old? Your provider falls behind

What it means for you. Two generations behind. Older processors, DDR4 memory, PCIe 3.0 that cannot run NVMe drives at full speed, and spare parts that are no longer made. At Konet, Dell PowerEdge R7625 from May 2026, with PCIe 5.0, DDR5 and an active manufacturer warranty.

Dell PowerEdge R7625 or Refurbished server 8 or more years old? Your provider falls behind

What it means for you. A second-hand machine, 10 years old, with drives and memory at the end of their life, DDR3 memory and no NVMe slot. A failure is only a matter of time. At Konet all servers are brand new, identical Dell PowerEdge R7625.

Dell PowerEdge R7625 or Desktop motherboard in a rack? Your provider falls behind

What it means for you. It is not a server. A desktop motherboard with a consumer processor, 2 memory channels without ECC and no remote management. It is the basis of most cheap "dedicated" servers on the market. At Konet every machine is a Dell PowerEdge R7625, built for 24/7 operation, with iDRAC and ECC memory.

Dell PowerEdge R7625 or Does not publish the server model or age? Your provider falls behind

What it means for you. Ask them the model and year of the server that hosts your site. If they don't answer, you know why.

Dell PowerEdge R7625 or I don't know what my provider runs? Unknown

What it means for you. You do not know, and that says something. How fast and stable your site will be depends on the hardware, and your provider should state it with models, not adjectives. At Konet the answer is written down, Dell PowerEdge R7625, many identical servers, 2U dual-socket, PCIe 5.0, received new in May 2026.

AMD EPYC 9454P, 48 Zen 4 cores (server, 2023) Tie

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 9454P: CPU power (PassMark) 94.689 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 48-core server) · How much slower 1,1 times or 12% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 48 (on one server, without overselling).

Same generation as ours, with one CPU instead of two, so a server with 12% less total power. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 9454P can fit at most 48 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD EPYC 9354, 32 Zen 4 cores (server, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 9354: CPU power (PassMark) 73.240 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 3% (of a 32-core server) · How much slower 1,5 times or 32% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 32 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD EPYC 9354 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 32% less power than ours and is 1,5 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 9354 can fit at most 32 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD EPYC 7543, 32 Zen 3 cores (server, 2021) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 7543: CPU power (PassMark) 60.960 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 3% (of a 32-core server) · How much slower 1,8 times or 43% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 32 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD EPYC 7543 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 43% less power than ours and is 1,8 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 7543 can fit at most 32 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD EPYC 7502P / 7401P, Zen 2 (server, 2019) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 7502P / 7401P: CPU power (PassMark) 51.128 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 3% (of a 32-core server) · How much slower 2,1 times or 52% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 32 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD EPYC 7502P / 7401P are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 52% less power than ours and is 2,1 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 7502P / 7401P can fit at most 32 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Xeon Platinum 8468, 48 cores (server, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon Platinum 8468: CPU power (PassMark) ≈ 60.700 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 48-core server) · How much slower 1,8 times or 44% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 48 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 44% less power than ours and is 1,8 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Xeon Platinum 8468 can fit at most 48 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Xeon Gold 5412U, 24 cores (server, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon Gold 5412U: CPU power (PassMark) 50.314 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 4% (of a 24-core server) · How much slower 2,1 times or 53% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 24 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Xeon Gold 5412U are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 53% less power than ours and is 2,1 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Xeon Gold 5412U can fit at most 24 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D / 7950X, 16 cores (desktop, 2022-2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D / 7950X: CPU power (PassMark) 62.297 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 6% (of a 16-core server) · How much slower 1,7 times or 42% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 16 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D / 7950X are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 42% less power than ours and is 1,7 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D / 7950X can fit at most 16 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 7 7700, 8 cores (desktop, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 7 7700: CPU power (PassMark) 34.319 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 12% (of a 8-core server) · How much slower 3,1 times or 68% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 8 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 7 7700 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 68% less power than ours and is 3,1 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 7 7700 can fit at most 8 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8700GE, 8 cores 35 W (desktop, 2024) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8700GE: CPU power (PassMark) 28.052 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 12% (of a 8-core server) · How much slower 3,8 times or 74% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 8 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8700GE are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 74% less power than ours and is 3,8 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8700GE can fit at most 8 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X / 5900X, Zen 3 (desktop, 2020) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 9 5950X / 5900X: CPU power (PassMark) 45.252 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 6% (of a 16-core server) · How much slower 2,4 times or 58% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 16 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X / 5900X are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 58% less power than ours and is 2,4 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 9 5950X / 5900X can fit at most 16 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / Ryzen 7 3700X / Ryzen 9 3900, Zen 2 (desktop, 2019) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / Ryzen 7 3700X / Ryzen 9 3900: CPU power (PassMark) 17.651 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 17% (of a 6-core server) · How much slower 6,1 times or 84% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 6 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / Ryzen 7 3700X / Ryzen 9 3900 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 84% less power than ours and is 6,1 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / Ryzen 7 3700X / Ryzen 9 3900 can fit at most 6 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265 / Core i9-13900 / i9-14900 (desktop, 2023-2024) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Core Ultra 7 265 / Core i9-13900 / i9-14900: CPU power (PassMark) 49.689 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 5% (of a 20-core server) · How much slower 2,2 times or 54% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 20 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Core Ultra 7 265 / Core i9-13900 / i9-14900 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 54% less power than ours and is 2,2 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Core Ultra 7 265 / Core i9-13900 / i9-14900 can fit at most 20 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Core i5-13500, 6+8 cores (desktop, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Core i5-13500: CPU power (PassMark) 30.739 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 7% (of a 14-core server) · How much slower 3,5 times or 71% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 14 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Core i5-13500 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 71% less power than ours and is 3,5 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Core i5-13500 can fit at most 14 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Core i9-9900K / Xeon W-2145 (2017-2018) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Core i9-9900K / Xeon W-2145: CPU power (PassMark) 18.034 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 12% (of a 8-core server) · How much slower 6 times or 83% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 8 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Core i9-9900K / Xeon W-2145 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 83% less power than ours and is 6 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Core i9-9900K / Xeon W-2145 can fit at most 8 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Core i7-8700 / Xeon E-2186G, 6 cores (2017-2018) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Core i7-8700 / Xeon E-2186G: CPU power (PassMark) 12.735 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 17% (of a 6-core server) · How much slower 8,4 times or 88% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 6 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Core i7-8700 / Xeon E-2186G are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 88% less power than ours and is 8,4 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Core i7-8700 / Xeon E-2186G can fit at most 6 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Core i7-6700 / i7-7700 / Xeon E3-1275 v5-v6, 4 cores (2015-2017) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Core i7-6700 / i7-7700 / Xeon E3-1275 v5-v6: CPU power (PassMark) 8.641 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 25% (of a 4-core server) · How much slower 12,4 times or 92% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 4 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Core i7-6700 / i7-7700 / Xeon E3-1275 v5-v6 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 92% less power than ours and is 12,4 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Core i7-6700 / i7-7700 / Xeon E3-1275 v5-v6 can fit at most 4 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because architecture, cache, memory channels and core count matter, not frequency. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with PassMark 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor's, do not slow you down.

Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3-v4 / E5-2620 v4 / E3-1271 v3 (server, 2014-2016) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3-v4 / E5-2620 v4 / E3-1271 v3: CPU power (PassMark) 15.947 (two CPUs combined) · What share of the server is your 1 core 6% (of a 16-core server) · How much slower 6,7 times or 85% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 16 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3-v4 / E5-2620 v4 / E3-1271 v3 are not the same thing. A server with this processor has 85% less power than ours and is 6,7 times slower, so the same 1 core give you correspondingly less performance when your website needs them. To avoid overselling, a server with the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3-v4 / E5-2620 v4 / E3-1271 v3 fits at most 16 plans like yours. If the provider puts more on it, your 1 core exists only on paper and every spike from your neighbor slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz don't matter. A 3,5 GHz processor from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz processor from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the frequency. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so spikes, yours or your neighbor's, don't slow you down.

Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 / E5620 / E3-1230 v2 (server, 2010-2013) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 / E5620 / E3-1230 v2: CPU power (PassMark) 22.478 (two CPUs combined) · What share of the server is your 1 core 5% (of a 20-core server) · How much slower 4,8 times or 79% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 20 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 / E5620 / E3-1230 v2 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 79% less power than ours and is 4,8 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 / E5620 / E3-1230 v2 can fit at most 20 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD EPYC 9224 / 9124, 16-24 Zen 4 cores (server, 2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 9224 / 9124: CPU power (PassMark) 48.967 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 4% (of a 24-core server) · How much slower 2,2 times or 54% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 24 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD EPYC 9224 / 9124 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 54% less power than ours and is 2,2 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 9224 / 9124 can fit at most 24 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD EPYC 7282 / 7317P, 16 Zen 2-3 cores (server, 2019-2021) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 7282 / 7317P: CPU power (PassMark) 30.359 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 6% (of a 16-core server) · How much slower 3,5 times or 72% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 16 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on the AMD EPYC 7282 / 7317P are not the same thing. A server with this processor has 72% less power than ours and is 3,5 times slower, so the same 1 core give you correspondingly less performance when your website needs them. To avoid overselling, a server with the AMD EPYC 7282 / 7317P fits at most 16 plans like yours. If the provider puts more on it, your 1 core exists only on paper and every spike from your neighbor slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz don't matter. A 3,5 GHz processor from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz processor from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the frequency. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so spikes, yours or your neighbor's, don't slow you down.

AMD EPYC 4244P / 4344P / 4464P, 6-12 cores (2024) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 4244P / 4344P / 4464P: CPU power (PassMark) 33.325 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 12% (of a 8-core server) · How much slower 3,2 times or 69% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 8 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD EPYC 4244P / 4344P / 4464P are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 69% less power than ours and is 3,2 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD EPYC 4244P / 4344P / 4464P can fit at most 8 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X / Ryzen 9 7900, 8-12 cores (desktop, 2023-2024) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 7 9700X / Ryzen 9 7900: CPU power (PassMark) 36.939 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 12% (of a 8-core server) · How much slower 2,9 times or 66% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 8 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 7 9700X / Ryzen 9 7900 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 66% less power than ours and is 2,9 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X / Ryzen 9 7900 can fit at most 8 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X / Ryzen 7 5800X, 6-8 cores (desktop, 2020) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD Ryzen 5 5600X / Ryzen 7 5800X: CPU power (PassMark) 21.823 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 17% (of a 6-core server) · How much slower 4,9 times or 80% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 6 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an AMD Ryzen 5 5600X / Ryzen 7 5800X are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 80% less power than ours and is 4,9 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. To avoid overselling, a server with AMD Ryzen 5 5600X / Ryzen 7 5800X can fit at most 6 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Xeon E-2386G / E-2388G / E-2336, 6-8 cores (server, 2021) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon E-2386G / E-2388G / E-2336: CPU power (PassMark) 19.521 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 17% (of a 6-core server) · How much slower 5,5 times or 82% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 6 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on an Intel Xeon E-2386G / E-2388G / E-2336 are not the same thing. A server with this CPU has 82% less power than ours and is 5,5 times slower, so the same 1 core gives you correspondingly less performance when your site needs it. To avoid overselling, a server with Intel Xeon E-2386G / E-2388G / E-2336 can fit at most 6 plans like yours. If the provider puts in more, your 1 core exists only on paper and every traffic spike next door slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Intel Xeon Silver 4314 / 4410Y, 12-16 cores (server, 2021-2023) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). Intel Xeon Silver 4314 / 4410Y: CPU power (PassMark) 28.437 (one CPU) · What share of the server is your 1 core 6% (of a 16-core server) · How much slower 3,8 times or 74% (less power than our servers) · How many plans like yours fit 16 (on one server, without overselling).

1 core at Konet and 1 core on the Intel Xeon Silver 4314 / 4410Y are not the same thing. A server with this processor has 74% less power than ours and is 3,8 times slower, so the same 1 core give you correspondingly less performance when your website needs them. To avoid overselling, a server with the Intel Xeon Silver 4314 / 4410Y fits at most 16 plans like yours. If the provider puts more on it, your 1 core exists only on paper and every spike from your neighbor slows you down. At Konet, the 64 cores fit 64 such plans, and each server hosts only a few accounts. GHz don't matter. A 3,5 GHz processor from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz processor from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the frequency. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so spikes, yours or your neighbor's, don't slow you down.

AMD EPYC 7003 Milan, no model (server, 2021) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). AMD EPYC 7003 Milan, no model: CPU power (PassMark) Unknown (cannot be measured without a model) · What share of the server is your 1 core Unknown (you do not know how many cores the server has) · How much slower Unknown (ask for the exact model) · How many plans like yours fit Unknown (ask how many they put on each server).

1 core does not mean 1 core everywhere. Without a model, you do not know how powerful the server behind it is, or what share of the server it is. Ask your provider for the exact model, and whether it is a desktop or a server CPU. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Publishes no model, only a clock speed (e.g. “2,4 GHz”) Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). No model published: CPU power (PassMark) Unknown (cannot be measured without a model) · What share of the server is your 1 core Unknown (you do not know how many cores the server has) · How much slower Unknown (ask for the exact model) · How many plans like yours fit Unknown (ask how many they put on each server).

1 core does not mean 1 core everywhere. Without a model, you do not know how powerful the server behind it is, or what share of the server it is. Ask your provider for the exact model, and whether it is a desktop or a server CPU. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

Publishes no model, only “powerful servers” or just “Intel Xeon” Your provider falls behind

Konet, 2× AMD EPYC 9334: CPU power (PassMark) 107.540 (two CPUs in every server) · What share of the server is your 1 core 2% (of a 64-core server) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · How many plans like yours fit 64 (on one server, without overselling). No model published: CPU power (PassMark) Unknown (cannot be measured without a model) · What share of the server is your 1 core Unknown (you do not know how many cores the server has) · How much slower Unknown (ask for the exact model) · How many plans like yours fit Unknown (ask how many they put on each server).

1 core does not mean 1 core everywhere. Without a model, you do not know how powerful the server behind it is, or what share of the server it is. Ask your provider for the exact model, and whether it is a desktop or a server CPU. What a desktop CPU means. A desktop CPU, Ryzen or Core i5/i7/i9, was designed for one user in front of one screen, with a few cores that run fast for a few seconds, 2 memory channels without ECC, few PCIe lanes and thermal limits that throttle it under constant load. A server CPU, EPYC or Xeon, was designed for hundreds of parallel requests around the clock, with many cores, a large cache, 8 to 12 memory channels with ECC, 128 PCIe lanes for disks and network, and steady performance at 100% load for years. A “server” with a desktop CPU hosts websites on office computer hardware. GHz are not what matters. A 3,5 GHz CPU from 2017 and a 2,7 GHz CPU from 2023 differ many times over in performance, because what counts is the architecture, the cache, the memory channels and the number of cores, not the clock speed. At Konet, your 1 core is 2% of a 64-core server with a PassMark score of 107.540, and the rest of the server stays free, so traffic spikes, yours or your neighbor’s, do not slow you down.

DDR5 ECC Registered (RDIMM), 4800-5600 MT/s Tie

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 12-24 (depending on whether it has one or two CPUs) · How fast memory is read 460-920 GB/s (same memory technology) · How much slower Same (same memory technology) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path).

Same memory. Your 1 GB is read at the same speed with the same ECC. Just ask how many channels the server has and whether the 1 GB is guaranteed for you.

DDR5 ECC UDIMM (unbuffered), 4800-5600 MT/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR5 ECC UDIMM: Paths to memory (channels) 2 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 90 GB/s (for your 1 GB, 2 channels of DDR5 UDIMM) · How much slower 10 times or 90% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on 2 channels of DDR5 UDIMM, about 90 GB/s, that is 10 times slower than our servers. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

DDR5 “ECC On-Die” (desktop DDR5, 5200-5600 MT/s) Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR5 “ECC On-Die”: Paths to memory (channels) 2 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 90 GB/s (for your 1 GB, 2 channels of desktop DDR5) · How much slower 10 times or 90% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Only inside the chip (not on the path to the CPU).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on 2 channels of desktop DDR5, about 90 GB/s, that is 10 times slower than our servers. “On-Die ECC” corrects errors only inside the chip, not on the path to the CPU. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

DDR5 without ECC, 4800-6000 MT/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR5 without ECC: Paths to memory (channels) 2 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 90 GB/s (for your 1 GB, 2 channels of DDR5 without ECC) · How much slower 10 times or 90% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) No (an error stays, meaning a freeze or corrupted data).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on 2 channels of DDR5 without ECC, about 90 GB/s, that is 10 times slower than our servers. And without ECC, an error in your 1 GB is not corrected, meaning a freeze, a reboot or corrupted data. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

DDR4 ECC, 2133-3200 MT/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR4 ECC: Paths to memory (channels) 2-8 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 100 GB/s (for your 1 GB, 2 to 8 channels of DDR4 ECC) · How much slower 9 times or 89% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on 2 to 8 channels of DDR4 ECC, about 100 GB/s, which is 9 times slower than our servers. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

DDR4 without ECC, 2133-3200 MT/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR4 without ECC: Paths to memory (channels) 2 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 51 GB/s (for your 1 GB, 2 channels of DDR4 without ECC) · How much slower 17,6 times or 94% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) No (an error stays, meaning a freeze or corrupted data).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on 2 channels of DDR4 without ECC, about 51 GB/s, that is 17,6 times slower than our servers. And without ECC, an error in your 1 GB is not corrected, meaning a freeze, a reboot or corrupted data. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

DDR3, 1333-1866 MT/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, DDR5 ECC Registered: Paths to memory (channels) 24 (per server, 12 per CPU) · How fast memory is read 900+ GB/s (for your 1 GB) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) Yes, fully (both inside the chip and on the path). DDR3: Paths to memory (channels) 2 (for the whole server) · How fast memory is read ≈ 25 GB/s (for your 1 GB, DDR3 from 2010) · How much slower 36 times or 97% (slower than our servers’ memory) · Corrects memory errors (ECC) No (an error stays, meaning a freeze or corrupted data).

Your 1 GB of RAM would live on DDR3 from 2010, about 25 GB/s, that is 36 times slower than our servers. And without ECC, an error in your 1 GB is not corrected, meaning a freeze, a reboot or corrupted data. At Konet, your 1 GB is reserved on DDR5 ECC Registered with 24 channels, over 900 GB/s, with real error correction.

Enterprise NVMe PCIe 4.0 (e.g. Micron 7450, Samsung PM9A3, Kioxia CD6) Tie

Konet, Micron 7450 MAX: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) 1.000.000 (Micron 7450 MAX) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk, in RAID 10) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (each email is a small file, and NVMe reads thousands per second) · Write endurance (DWPD) 3 DWPD (writes its full capacity 3 times every day, for 5 years) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling). Enterprise NVMe PCIe 4.0: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) ≈ 1.000.000 (same disk class) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk) · How much slower Same (same disk class) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (same disk class) · Write endurance (DWPD) 1-3 DWPD (ask for the exact model) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling).

Same disk class. Your 5.120 IOPS and 5 MB/s are a small share of an enterprise NVMe. Just ask for the model, the endurance (DWPD) and whether it is in RAID.

Consumer NVMe (e.g. Samsung 980 PRO, PM9A1, WD SN850) Your provider falls behind

Konet, Micron 7450 MAX: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) 1.000.000 (Micron 7450 MAX) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk, in RAID 10) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (each email is a small file, and NVMe reads thousands per second) · Write endurance (DWPD) 3 DWPD (writes its full capacity 3 times every day, for 5 years) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling). Consumer NVMe: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) ≈ 1.000.000 (on paper, until its cache fills up) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk) · How much slower Same on paper (drops sharply once its cache fills up) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (while the disk is fresh and empty) · Write endurance (DWPD) 0,3 DWPD (withstands 10 times less writing) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling).

On paper, a consumer NVMe delivers your 5.120 IOPS, but once its cache fills up with writes from an online store database and backups, its speed collapses. It withstands 10 times less writing (0,3 vs 3 DWPD), and in a power outage it loses whatever was in its cache. At Konet, your 5.120 IOPS are 0,5% of a Micron 7450 MAX (1.000.000 IOPS per disk, 3 DWPD, power loss protection), in RAID 10.

SATA SSD (e.g. Micron 5300, Samsung 870, Crucial MX) Your provider falls behind

Konet, Micron 7450 MAX: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) 1.000.000 (Micron 7450 MAX) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk, in RAID 10) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (each email is a small file, and NVMe reads thousands per second) · Write endurance (DWPD) 3 DWPD (writes its full capacity 3 times every day, for 5 years) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling). SATA SSD: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) ≈ 90.000 (the limit of the SATA port) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 6% (of one disk) · How much slower 11,1 times or 91% (fewer IOPS than our disk) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails ≈ 1 second (thousands of small files through one SATA port) · Write endurance (DWPD) 0,3-1,3 DWPD (depending on the model) · How many plans like yours fit 17 (on one disk, without overselling).

A SATA SSD caps out at 550 MB/s and about 90.000 IOPS for the whole server. Your 5.120 IOPS would be 6% of the whole disk, shared with all the other sites, and your 5 MB/s would be 0,9% of the port. Your emails, thousands of small files, go through the same narrow port as your online store database. At Konet, your 5.120 IOPS are 0,5% of a Micron 7450 MAX (1.000.000 IOPS per disk, 3 DWPD, power loss protection), in RAID 10.

SATA HDD, mechanical disk 5.400-7.200 rpm Your provider falls behind

Konet, Micron 7450 MAX: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) 1.000.000 (Micron 7450 MAX) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk, in RAID 10) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (each email is a small file, and NVMe reads thousands per second) · Write endurance (DWPD) 3 DWPD (writes its full capacity 3 times every day, for 5 years) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling). SATA HDD: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) ≈ 150 (a mechanical head that has to move) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS Not achievable (the disk cannot deliver even your plan) · How much slower 6.667 times or 99,9% (fewer IOPS than our disk) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails ≈ 30 seconds (each email is one head movement, 5.000 movements) · Write endurance (DWPD) Not defined (mechanical disks wear out mechanically, not from writing) · How many plans like yours fit 0 (on one disk, without overselling).

A mechanical disk delivers 100 to 200 IOPS in total, for all the sites on the server. The 5.120 IOPS of your plan are 34 times more than the whole disk can deliver, so they are not even achievable. For your email, it is even worse. Each email is a small file, and the mechanical disk moves its head for every one. A folder with 5.000 emails takes about 30 seconds to open, a search inside it even longer, and while email crawls your online store crawls too, because they share the same disk. At Konet, your 5.120 IOPS are 0,5% of a Micron 7450 MAX (1.000.000 IOPS per disk, 3 DWPD, power loss protection), in RAID 10.

Network storage (Ceph, SAN, cloud volume) Your provider falls behind

Konet, Micron 7450 MAX: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) 1.000.000 (Micron 7450 MAX) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS 0,5% (of one disk, in RAID 10) · How much slower Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Instantly (each email is a small file, and NVMe reads thousands per second) · Write endurance (DWPD) 3 DWPD (writes its full capacity 3 times every day, for 5 years) · How many plans like yours fit 195 (on one disk, without overselling). Network storage: Operations per second per disk (IOPS) Unknown (depends on the network and on the other servers) · What share of the disk are your 5.120 IOPS Unknown (every operation travels over the network) · How much slower Slower on every operation (the network adds latency to every read) · Opening a folder with 5.000 emails Slowly (thousands of small files, each over the network) · Write endurance (DWPD) Unknown (ask what disks are behind it) · How many plans like yours fit Unknown (ask how many servers share the storage).

Each of your 5.120 disk operations would travel over the network, with latency many times that of a local NVMe. Checkout and every query to your database wait, and your emails, thousands of small files, open one by one over the network. At Konet, your 5.120 IOPS are 0,5% of a Micron 7450 MAX (1.000.000 IOPS per disk, 3 DWPD, power loss protection), in RAID 10.

RAID 10 Tie

Konet, RAID 10 on NVMe: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (RAID 10, every disk has a mirror) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server works normally meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (the disk is replaced without shutting down the server). RAID 10: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (before data is lost) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Same (same RAID layout) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe ≈ 1 hour (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD ≈ 1-2 hours (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD ≈ 8-12 hours (the server crawls meanwhile) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (until the rebuild finishes).

Same layout. Your 5.120 IOPS are spread across many disks and a single failure does not touch them. Just ask whether a failed disk is hot-swapped.

RAID 1 (mirroring) Your provider falls behind

Konet, RAID 10 on NVMe: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (RAID 10, every disk has a mirror) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server works normally meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (the disk is replaced without shutting down the server). RAID 1: How many failed disks it survives 1 disk (before data is lost) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are 2 times or 50% (slower writes, with 4 disks) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe ≈ 1 hour (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD ≈ 1-2 hours (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD ≈ 8-12 hours (the server crawls meanwhile) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, reads slower (until the rebuild finishes).

In RAID 1, your 5.120 IOPS come from two mirrored disks, writing at the speed of a single disk. It survives a failure, but without the speed of RAID 10. At Konet, RAID 10 keeps your site online and at the same speed even if a disk fails, and the disk is hot-swapped.

RAID 5 / RAID 6 (parity) Your provider falls behind

Konet, RAID 10 on NVMe: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (RAID 10, every disk has a mirror) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server works normally meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (the disk is replaced without shutting down the server). RAID 5 / RAID 6: How many failed disks it survives 1 disk (RAID 6: 2) (before data is lost) · Disk writes per write 4 (RAID 6: 6) (to calculate parity) · How much slower writes are 2 times or 50% (slower writes, with 4 disks) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 1-2 hours (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe ≈ 2-4 hours (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD ≈ 3-6 hours (the server runs slower meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD ≈ 1-3 days (the server crawls meanwhile) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, but crawls (until the rebuild finishes).

In RAID 5 or 6, every write from your online store needs 4 disk operations for parity, and after a failure the rebuild takes hours with the server crawling, while your customers are shopping. At Konet, RAID 10 keeps your site online and at the same speed even if a disk fails, and the disk is hot-swapped.

RAID 0 (striping only) Your provider falls behind

Konet, RAID 10 on NVMe: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (RAID 10, every disk has a mirror) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server works normally meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (the disk is replaced without shutting down the server). RAID 0: How many failed disks it survives None (before data is lost) · Disk writes per write 1 (no protection) · How much slower writes are Faster (but with no protection at all) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD Not available (restore from backup only) · If a disk fails, your site Goes down, data is lost (until a disk and a backup are found).

In RAID 0, one disk failure wipes out your entire site, and the more disks there are, the higher the chance. Restore from backup only, with whatever data loss that means. At Konet, RAID 10 keeps your site online and at the same speed even if a disk fails, and the disk is hot-swapped.

No RAID, a single disk Your provider falls behind

Konet, RAID 10 on NVMe: How many failed disks it survives 1 in each pair (RAID 10, every disk has a mirror) · Disk writes per write 2 (one to the disk, one to the mirror) · How much slower writes are Baseline (we measure your provider against this) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe ≈ 30 minutes (the server works normally meanwhile) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD We do not use them (only enterprise NVMe in our servers) · If a disk fails, your site Stays online, same speed (the disk is replaced without shutting down the server). No RAID: How many failed disks it survives None (before data is lost) · Disk writes per write 1 (no protection) · How much slower writes are 2 times or 50% (slower writes, with 4 disks) · Rebuild of 2 TB on enterprise NVMe Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on consumer NVMe Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on SATA SSD Not available (restore from backup only) · Rebuild of 2 TB on HDD Not available (restore from backup only) · If a disk fails, your site Goes down, data is lost (until a disk and a backup are found).

With a single disk and no RAID, one failure takes your site down until a disk is found and a restore from backup is done. At Konet, RAID 10 keeps your site online and at the same speed even if a disk fails, and the disk is hot-swapped.

IPMI / BMC on a server motherboard (Supermicro, ASRock Rack, HPE iLO) Tie

Konet, Dell iDRAC9: Who sees that something is failing Our team (iDRAC9 monitors disks, memory and temperatures 24/7) · When they find out Before the server goes down (the sensors give warning) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Yes (we see the server’s screen even without an operating system) · Downtime if a component fails Scheduled (we replace it before it fails, whenever possible). IPMI / BMC on a server motherboard: Who sees that something is failing Their team, if they watch it (ask them who and how) · When they find out Before it goes down, if someone is watching (and then they look for what failed) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Yes (when the operating system freezes) · Downtime if a component fails Hours (a ticket to the datacenter, if they catch it in time).

Technology equivalent to iDRAC. Ask whether their team actually uses it to monitor disks, memory and temperatures around the clock.

Only a rescue system or a reset from the provider’s panel Your provider falls behind

Konet, Dell iDRAC9: Who sees that something is failing Our team (iDRAC9 monitors disks, memory and temperatures 24/7) · When they find out Before the server goes down (the sensors give warning) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Yes (we see the server’s screen even without an operating system) · Downtime if a component fails Scheduled (we replace it before it fails, whenever possible). Only a rescue system or a reset from the provider’s panel: Who sees that something is failing No one, until it goes down (ask them who and how) · When they find out When the server goes down (and then they look for what failed) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Only a reset (when the operating system freezes) · Downtime if a component fails Hours to days (without knowing what failed).

When hardware fails without iDRAC, the provider opens a ticket with the datacenter and a third-party technician goes to the rack whenever their queue allows, without knowing what broke. The Standard plan and your orders stay down for hours, with no time estimate. At Konet, iDRAC9 shows our team which component has a problem, often before the server goes down, and we replace it on schedule. Your online store never finds out that something broke.

Desktop motherboard (e.g. ASUS PRIME/TUF, MSI PRO, Gigabyte B650/Z790, ASRock B550) without IPMI Your provider falls behind

Konet, Dell iDRAC9: Who sees that something is failing Our team (iDRAC9 monitors disks, memory and temperatures 24/7) · When they find out Before the server goes down (the sensors give warning) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Yes (we see the server’s screen even without an operating system) · Downtime if a component fails Scheduled (we replace it before it fails, whenever possible). Desktop motherboard without IPMI: Who sees that something is failing No one (ask them who and how) · When they find out When the server goes down (and then they look for what failed) · Remote restart, even if it freezes No (when the operating system freezes) · Downtime if a component fails Hours to days (no management chip on the motherboard).

When hardware fails without iDRAC, the provider opens a ticket with the datacenter and a third-party technician goes to the rack whenever their queue allows, without knowing what broke. The Standard plan and your orders stay down for hours, with no time estimate. At Konet, iDRAC9 shows our team which component has a problem, often before the server goes down, and we replace it on schedule. Your online store never finds out that something broke.

No remote management at all Your provider falls behind

Konet, Dell iDRAC9: Who sees that something is failing Our team (iDRAC9 monitors disks, memory and temperatures 24/7) · When they find out Before the server goes down (the sensors give warning) · Remote restart, even if it freezes Yes (we see the server’s screen even without an operating system) · Downtime if a component fails Scheduled (we replace it before it fails, whenever possible). No remote management at all: Who sees that something is failing No one (ask them who and how) · When they find out When the server goes down (and then they look for what failed) · Remote restart, even if it freezes No (when the operating system freezes) · Downtime if a component fails Hours to days (only with someone physically at the rack).

When hardware fails without iDRAC, the provider opens a ticket with the datacenter and a third-party technician goes to the rack whenever their queue allows, without knowing what broke. The Standard plan and your orders stay down for hours, with no time estimate. At Konet, iDRAC9 shows our team which component has a problem, often before the server goes down, and we replace it on schedule. Your online store never finds out that something broke.

10 Gbit/s Tie

Konet, 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (10 Gbit/s on every server) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (without taking anything from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (the site does not slow down) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Baseline (we measure your provider against this). 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (ask whether it is dedicated or shared) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (if no other servers share it) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (with its own line) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Same (same capacity).

Same line. What matters is whether it is dedicated to the server or shared across a rack, and whether backups go over it or over a separate network. Ask them, and ask whether they have DDoS protection.

3 Gbit/s public line Your provider falls behind

Konet, 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (10 Gbit/s on every server) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (without taking anything from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (the site does not slow down) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Baseline (we measure your provider against this). 3 Gbit/s public line: Line capacity 375 MB/s (3 Gbit/s public line) · Left for backups when visitors take half 188 MB/s (and every MB the backup uses is taken from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 1,5 hours (the site slows down while it runs) · Full server restore 1 TB 44,4 minutes (using the full line, with the sites down meanwhile) · How much slower the line is 3,3 times or 70% (slower than our servers’ line).

The 3 Gbit/s public line is not just for your plan, it serves the whole server. The line carries 375 MB/s in total. When visitors to all the sites fill it to 50%, 188 MB/s are left for everything else, file backups, image backups and restores, which all run through the same port. A 1 TB image backup then takes 1,5 hours, and while it runs, every MB the backup takes is lost to visitors, so your site slows down or the backup is delayed, 3,3 times more than on our servers. A restore at peak time is the worst case, because it has to finish fast and there is no bandwidth to spare. If the server goes down and has to be restored in full, 1 TB, using the full line takes 44,4 minutes just for the transfer, and all its sites are down for as long as it takes. At Konet, every server has its own 10 Gbit/s line, 1.250 MB/s. With visitors at 50%, 625 MB/s are left for the backups every 2 hours, the image backups and the restores, so they run alongside your site without slowing it down, a 1 TB image in about 26,7 minutes. If a full 1 TB server restore is needed, it takes 13,3 minutes using the full line.

2,5 Gbit/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (10 Gbit/s on every server) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (without taking anything from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (the site does not slow down) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Baseline (we measure your provider against this). 2: Line capacity 312 MB/s (2,5 Gbit/s) · Left for backups when visitors take half 156 MB/s (and every MB the backup uses is taken from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 1,8 hours (the site slows down while it runs) · Full server restore 1 TB 53,4 minutes (using the full line, with the sites down meanwhile) · How much slower the line is 4 times or 75% (slower than our servers’ line).

The 2,5 Gbit/s line is not just for your plan, it serves the whole server. The line carries 312 MB/s in total. When visitors to all the sites fill it to 50%, 156 MB/s are left for everything else, file backups, image backups and restores, which all run through the same port. A 1 TB image backup then takes 1,8 hours, and while it runs, every MB the backup takes is lost to visitors, so your site slows down or the backup is delayed, 4 times more than on our servers. A restore at peak time is the worst case, because it has to finish fast and there is no bandwidth to spare. If the server goes down and has to be restored in full, 1 TB, using the full line takes 53,4 minutes just for the transfer, and all its sites are down for as long as it takes. At Konet, every server has its own 10 Gbit/s line, 1.250 MB/s. With visitors at 50%, 625 MB/s are left for the backups every 2 hours, the image backups and the restores, so they run alongside your site without slowing it down, a 1 TB image in about 26,7 minutes. If a full 1 TB server restore is needed, it takes 13,3 minutes using the full line.

1 Gbit/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (10 Gbit/s on every server) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (without taking anything from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (the site does not slow down) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Baseline (we measure your provider against this). 1 Gbit/s: Line capacity 125 MB/s (1 Gbit/s) · Left for backups when visitors take half 62,5 MB/s (and every MB the backup uses is taken from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 4,4 hours (the site slows down while it runs) · Full server restore 1 TB 2,2 hours (using the full line, with the sites down meanwhile) · How much slower the line is 10 times or 90% (slower than our servers’ line).

The 1 Gbit/s line is not just for your plan, it serves the whole server. The line carries 125 MB/s in total. When visitors to all the sites fill it to 50%, 62,5 MB/s are left for everything else, file backups, image backups and restores, which all run through the same port. A 1 TB image backup then takes 4,4 hours, and while it runs, every MB the backup takes is lost to visitors, so your site slows down or the backup is delayed, 10 times more than on our servers. A restore at peak time is the worst case, because it has to finish fast and there is no bandwidth to spare. If the server goes down and has to be restored in full, 1 TB, using the full line takes 2,2 hours just for the transfer, and all its sites are down for as long as it takes. At Konet, every server has its own 10 Gbit/s line, 1.250 MB/s. With visitors at 50%, 625 MB/s are left for the backups every 2 hours, the image backups and the restores, so they run alongside your site without slowing it down, a 1 TB image in about 26,7 minutes. If a full 1 TB server restore is needed, it takes 13,3 minutes using the full line.

100 Mbit/s Your provider falls behind

Konet, 10 Gbit/s: Line capacity 1.250 MB/s (10 Gbit/s on every server) · Left for backups when visitors take half 625 MB/s (without taking anything from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 26,7 minutes (the site does not slow down) · Full server restore 1 TB 13,3 minutes (using the full line) · How much slower the line is Baseline (we measure your provider against this). 100 Mbit/s: Line capacity 12,5 MB/s (100 Mbit/s) · Left for backups when visitors take half 6,2 MB/s (and every MB the backup uses is taken from visitors) · Backup of 1 TB while the site is running 44,4 hours (the site slows down while it runs) · Full server restore 1 TB 22,2 hours (using the full line, with the sites down meanwhile) · How much slower the line is 100 times or 99% (slower than our servers’ line).

The 100 Mbit/s line is not just for your plan, it serves the whole server. The line carries 12,5 MB/s in total. When visitors to all the sites fill it to 50%, 6,2 MB/s are left for everything else, file backups, image backups and restores, which all run through the same port. A 1 TB image backup then takes 44,4 hours, and while it runs, every MB the backup takes is lost to visitors, so your site slows down or the backup is delayed, 100 times more than on our servers. A restore at peak time is the worst case, because it has to finish fast and there is no bandwidth to spare. If the server goes down and has to be restored in full, 1 TB, using the full line takes 22,2 hours just for the transfer, and all its sites are down for as long as it takes. At Konet, every server has its own 10 Gbit/s line, 1.250 MB/s. With visitors at 50%, 625 MB/s are left for the backups every 2 hours, the image backups and the restores, so they run alongside your site without slowing it down, a 1 TB image in about 26,7 minutes. If a full 1 TB server restore is needed, it takes 13,3 minutes using the full line.